Recognition
of foreign divorce decree in India
is a complicated conflict of law principle. This is because the
marriage is solemnised in one country and the divorce
is obtained from another country. In the Indian context, a marriage
is solemnised in India and a divorce decree is obtained from a
foreign jurisdiction, especially United States or United Kingdom. The
reason for this dual proceedings is because in India marriage is
considered to be a sacrament and divorce is not easily obtainable. Of
course, where mutual consent is involved, there is little trouble in
dissolution of a marriage in India.
However, where the fault
theory is invoked or where one party is interested in divorce whereas
the other is not, it takes years for the party seeking divorce to get
the same. Some individuals have devised a mechanism of forum shopping
and they seek divorce from jurisdictions where it can be obtained
easily.
The Supreme Court of
India has given a constructive interpretation to the existing laws
and provisions of India to decide when such a foreign divorce decree
can be held to be valid and legal in India. This is so because the
matrimonial laws are not common everywhere in the world and they
differ from country to country. The problem arises when the parties
have their domicile
in one country and one of them obtains matrimonial relief in a
foreign country. A large number of foreign decrees in matrimonial
matters are becoming the order of the day. Similarly, illegal
domicile certificates are also very common these days to
get benefits of conflict of laws in areas like inheritance, taxation
and divorce.
India’s social, moral
and religious conditions, along with the “public policy”, will be
decisive for determining the matrimonial law, including
jurisdictional aspects, applicable in India and the harmonisation of
law cannot be achieved at the cost of their ignorance and sacrifice.
The courts can refuse to apply a rule of foreign law or recognise a
foreign judgment or a foreign arbitral award if it is found that the
same is contrary to the public policy of the country in which it is
sought to be invoked or enforced.
Under Section 13 of the
the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Code), a foreign judgment is not
conclusive as to any matter thereby “directly adjudicated upon”
“between the parties” if:
(a) it has not been
pronounced by a Court of competent jurisdiction; or
(b) it has not been given
on the merits of the case; or
(c) it is founded on an
incorrect view of international law or a refusal to recognize the law
of India in cases in which such law is applicable; or
(d) the proceedings are
opposed to natural justice, or
(e) it is obtained by
fraud, or
(f) it sustains a claim
founded on a breach of any law in force in India.
It is thus clear that in
order to make a foreign judgment conclusive in India; it must be
shown that it complies with all the abovementioned six conditions. If
there is no compliance of any one of these conditions, the foreign
judgment will not be conclusive and consequently not legally
effective and binding. A decree of a foreign Court is normally
recognised by a Court in another jurisdiction as a matter of comity
and public policy. But no country is bound to recognise and give
effect to a decree of a foreign Court if it is repugnant to its own
laws and public policy. So far as India is concerned, a judgment of a
foreign Court creates estoppel or res judicata between the same
parties provided such judgment is not subject to attack under any of
the Clauses (a) to (f) of section 13 of the Code.
Ultimately, it is a
question of fact that decides whether a foreign divorce decree can be
enforced in India or not. Further, advent of information and
communication technology (ICT) has added further complications for
recognition of foreign divorce decrees in India. Thus, only trained
legal professionals who are well versed in marriage and divorce,
conflict of laws principles and techno legal issues can best help in
this regard.
If you are interested in
our techno legal expertise regarding solving your conflict of laws
issues, please establish a client
attorney relationship so that we can assist you in your
matters.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.